Posts

Edureka vs Simplilearn

 Based on my personal experience, Edureka training is mostly suitable for Java based developers. All the examples and courses are designed based on Java. I struggled a lot for getting .net based examples. But, it is good for Java professionals. Whereas, Simplilearn trainers are providing .NET based examples during the Azure training course. Always check with the training company before you join.

Azure Learning path for .NET developers

 This information is suitable for 3 to 17 years experience in IT industry and atleast some coding knowledge in C#. Lot of people get confused what to start in Azure. Because, learning azure itself cannot be sufficient for .NET Architects. Example: if we are learning AZ104(Azure Administrator) where we are going to use?. Nothing practically useful. You must learn all dependent technologies as well. Also, you should not focus on certification only. Here is the complete path for .NET developers/Architects. More suitable for Windows environment. 1) Learn AZ900 (Azure Fundamentals) -- Approximately 12 hours -- No practicals required 2) Learn AZ104( Azure Administrator) -- Get Free access from Azure. Spend 80 to 120 hours for depth learning. Do all the basic exercises such as User creation, AD, VM Creation etc... 3) Learn Docker and Docker Hub -- Learn Docker and Docker hub tools. Spend around 20 hours. Learn Docker commands through command line tools as well. 4) Learn Microservices --...

Corporate trainers salary in India

Finding the corporate trainer in India is very difficult. There is no branded website to get the corporate trainers across Inda. Currently, the company HR is find the corporate trainer from the Job portal (Naukri.com, Shine.com, MonsterIndia.com etc..). But, those websites don't have the option of Corporate trainers. Also, .NET/C# technology trainers are getting paid between 5k to 15k per day depends on the negotiation. The mediator company one who provides the opportunity to trainer will earn more than what the trainer is getting. This is absolutely wrong.